<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Smartphone is Human &#124; John Dyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theodigital.com/2011/11/1115.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theodigital.com/2011/11/1115.html</link>
	<description>missional theology. digital media ecology. biscuits and gravy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Ridgeway</title>
		<link>http://www.theodigital.com/2011/11/1115.html/comment-page-1#comment-3857</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ridgeway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theodigital.com/?p=1115#comment-3857</guid>
		<description>Antoine -  oh, I think I meant something different with &quot;human.&quot;  Maybe &quot;human-like&quot; is better. I&#039;m not intending to say that smartphones are humans or speaking of something like artificial intelligence/sentience. I&#039;m saying that our interaction and use of them is somewhat &quot;natural&quot; to the condition of being human.  It&#039;s not robotic or or weird or out-of-character for us to use them.  They modify and amplify functions we already to (think, emote, relate, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antoine &#8211;  oh, I think I meant something different with &#8220;human.&#8221;  Maybe &#8220;human-like&#8221; is better. I&#8217;m not intending to say that smartphones are humans or speaking of something like artificial intelligence/sentience. I&#8217;m saying that our interaction and use of them is somewhat &#8220;natural&#8221; to the condition of being human.  It&#8217;s not robotic or or weird or out-of-character for us to use them.  They modify and amplify functions we already to (think, emote, relate, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine RJ Wrighht</title>
		<link>http://www.theodigital.com/2011/11/1115.html/comment-page-1#comment-3846</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine RJ Wrighht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theodigital.com/?p=1115#comment-3846</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Can a smartphone be sentient without the network? Is the current mode of smartphones too passive/reactive to be sentient?

I&#039;m not going to call it human, because we have not yet seen a smartphone demonstrate reason. I think we&#039;ll get to another mode/means/medium of communication before that happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Can a smartphone be sentient without the network? Is the current mode of smartphones too passive/reactive to be sentient?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to call it human, because we have not yet seen a smartphone demonstrate reason. I think we&#8217;ll get to another mode/means/medium of communication before that happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

